Are blockchains useful for supply chain transparency, disintermediation, and integrity control? To some extent, but there is a big difference between models that use intrinsic, native assets vs. extrinsic assets. The latter is currently very difficult to do in a decentralized way or without reintroducing counter-party risk. You need to think about this problem not only as a technologist but from the perspective of each of the human components involved. Sometimes the more you try to apply technical solutions, the easier it is for that system to be gamed by human ingenuity.

This is part of a talk which took place at the Bitcoin Open Blockchain (BOB) community event on October 29th 2017 at the mHUB innovation center in Chicago, Illinois: https://www.meetup.com/Bitcoin-Open-Blockchain-Community-Chicago/events/244248063/

Watch the full talk here: https://youtu.be/XCVaabu3J04

RELATED:
Immutability and Proof-of-Work: The Planetary Scale Digital Monument – https://youtu.be/rsLrJp6cLf4
Proof-of-Work (PoW), Proof-of-Stake (PoS), Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS) – https://youtu.be/3W_3AQrQEOM
Consensus with decentralized oracles and real-world variables – https://youtu.be/8bYmK6sZL00
What is mining? – https://youtu.be/t4p4iMqmxbQ
Solar energy and mining in space – https://youtu.be/cusakcpa8AM
What should not go on a blockchain? – https://youtu.be/shn9otsT-Pw
The 14nm limit, decentralization, and renewable-energy mining – https://youtu.be/gYwc_MCC4us

Andreas M. Antonopoulos is a technologist and serial entrepreneur who has become one of the most well-known and respected figures in bitcoin.

Follow on Twitter: @aantonop https://twitter.com/aantonop
Website: https://antonopoulos.com/

He is the author of two books: “Mastering Bitcoin,” published by O’Reilly Media and considered the best technical guide to bitcoin; “The Internet of Money,” a book about why bitcoin matters.

THE INTERNET OF MONEY, v1: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Internet-Money-collection-Andreas-Antonopoulos/dp/1537000454/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8

[NEW] THE INTERNET OF MONEY, v2: https://www.amazon.com/Internet-Money-Andreas-M-Antonopoulos/dp/194791006X/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8

MASTERING BITCOIN: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Mastering-Bitcoin-Unlocking-Digital-Cryptocurrencies/dp/1449374042

[NEW] MASTERING BITCOIN, 2nd Edition: https://www.amazon.com/Mastering-Bitcoin-Programming-Open-Blockchain/dp/1491954388

Subscribe to the channel to learn more about Bitcoin & open blockchains!

If you want early-access to talks and a chance to participate in a monthly LIVE Q&A with Andreas, become a patron: https://www.patreon.com/aantonop

Music: “Unbounded” by Orfan (https://www.facebook.com/Orfan/)
Outro Graphics: Phneep (http://www.phneep.com/)
Outro Art: Rock Barcellos (http://www.rockincomics.com.br/)

source

29 COMMENTS

  1. unbelievable to see this guy (usually brilliant ) get his trump hour
    truck driver example is the easiest thing to FIX!… truck driver simply driver they can't get anywhere near the goods car is sealed. If car breaks down its not his problem …

  2. Recording the text of a politician's public speeches into a blockchain would make politics less corrupt.
    Most seem happy to rewrite history inadvertantly causing dementia to old people.
    Viva Satosh!

  3. Do you realize that Modum in 6-12 months will have light sensors, ok, keep that in mind. And remind this, sensor are inside the box, not outside:). He gave that example with a mad truck driver that could broke " data integrity" but you can use light sensors and temperature sensors in the same packet:) . For a mad truck driver to broke data integrity of that packet, he needs to open the box, but guess what , LIGHT SENSORS. That s my argument for that shit. You can play with tech guys, that s the beauty. Don t listen to this kind of fudders and do your homework:) this comes from a modum investor, He is a bitcoin shiller and will die with it ,hist last argument is just fud without substance:)

  4. Distributed computing paid by a token so you don't need a datacenter is where I see this going. Also, immutability of a database is an intrinsic quality that I'm sure has value in supply chain management, but I'm not sure it's necessary to reinvent the wheel.

  5. Solarcoin turns this problem on its head by creating a token as an incentive for generating more of a particular extrinsic asset (in this case solar energy power plants). Sure, there is a central authority that determines who gets to redeem the coins, and it is up to the userbase to hold the party accountable. Counter party risk is there, but the whole point of solarcoin is to give free coins to people who have installed solar panels. The longer the system continues to operate honestly, the more succesfully the network will fullfill the primary purpose of incentivizing growth of installed solar power. If the authority is proven to be corrupt, the network can fork into a different authority. Theoretically each token is backed by one megawatt hour of clean energy, and transactions are secured by a decentralized proof of stake system.

    Similarly, Gridcoin leverages the existing BOINC project for distributed scientific computing, in which an organization issues scores to participants of various projects such as folding@HOME, SETI@HOME, einstein@HOME, cancer research, and others. A proof of stake blockchain uses BOINC scores as the extrinsic input, and the stakers vote to decide how much value should be assigned to each project in terms of how many tokens you get to redeem proportional to your BOINC score. This system has been so successful, that the Gridcoin network now crunches more research than the rest of the BOINC participants combined!

    I think the only reason these projects can be successful is because the extrinsic asset they certify supports an altruistic cause. It remains to be seen how corruptible the system can become if the projects reach much higher valuations.

    Cheers, and keep the great content coming!

  6. Wouldn't the supply chain sensor in this case be stored inside the shipment, not externally?…the driver would need to breach the seal of the shipment to access the censor to game it in such a fashion at which point the shipment would be considered tampered with. How does that apply?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here