A growth stock and a value stock are considered by most of the world to be very important distinctions between two entirely different kinds of companies. A growth stock is believed to be a company that’s growing very quickly and has a high market value relative to its earnings, while a value stock is thought to be a company that doesn’t grow much but has a low price and holds its value. In this video, I discuss the important distinctions between the two and let you know which one aligns with the Rule # Investing Strategy.
To sign-up for my Transformational Investing Webinar, visit: http://bit.ly/1R6xgk5
Think you have enough money saved for retirement? Learn more: http://bit.ly/1To86wr
Don’t forget to subscribe to my channel here: http://ow.ly/RNAnK
_____________
For more great Rule #1 content and training:
Podcast: http://bit.ly/1IBU5ei
Blog: http://bit.ly/22x7fzP
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Rule1_Investing
Google+: +PhilTownRule1Investing
Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/rule1investing/
source
Warren buffet proudly sponsors this video ?
What? You have growth companies, which are, usually, just starting to sell on the public market and have a high demand for their supply then you have a value company, which has a balanced and reoccurring demand for its supply.. 2 mins in is what I don't understand, because you can value a cement block as part of a company and sell it as a stock, but then if the stock goes up the cement block is worth x amount of times more… but in the end it's still a cement block and is sold for standard price.
This video is inaccurate. You just described value stocks when you said low prices with high intrinsic value. Value stocks are not slow. That's incredibly inaccurate. Value stocks cab be fast or whatever. Speed has nuffing to do with it. Value stocks are getting good companies at low prices.
which method do you like most in calculating intrinsic value, is it DCF, NCAV, or others methods